Exaro News Archive BBC pays 3,000 people via personal companies

BBC pays 3,000 people via personal companies


BBC pays 3,000 people via personal companies

No tax deducted at source for five BBC people earning more than £150,000 a year

By David Hencke | 23 March 2012

“There is a need for much greater transparency at the BBC” – Stephen Barclay, Conservative MP, public accounts committee

Around 3,000 people working for the BBC are paid through personal-service companies, the broadcaster has admitted. It said that five BBC people earn more than £150,000 a year without having tax deducted at source, as the row over public officials working ‘off payroll’ spreads.

Another 31 people working at the broadcaster earn more than £100,000 a year without having tax deducted at source, according to figures released by the BBC in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) from David Mowat, a Conservative MP.

The response excluded ‘talent’ – such as presenters and reporters – and people working in commercial subsidiaries, including BBC Worldwide. This means that the true scale of the practice at the BBC, which is funded by UK licence-fee payers, is higher than the numbers suggest.

Mowat told Exaro: “The government is rightly clamping down on this practice. The board of the BBC should do the same.”

He called for the BBC to be included in the Whitehall-wide review – ordered by Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the Treasury – of civil servants’ contacts.

The review was triggered after an investigation by Exaro, in conjunction with BBC2’s Newsnight, seven weeks ago revealed how the Student Loans Company was paying its chief executive, Ed Lester, through his personal-service company under concessions granted by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

Anyone employed through a personal company can avoid having to pay income tax and national insurance at source, and instead pay corporation tax – at a lower level.

The chancellor, George Osborne, announced in his budget on Wednesday a crackdown on this use of personal-service companies to avoid tax.

Exaro reported last month that Alexander wanted the Whitehall review to be extended to include health authorities, local government and the BBC. However, Jeremy Hunt, culture secretary, pointed out that ministers could not order the BBC to review its contracts.

Mowat raised the issue of the BBC in the House of Commons on Wednesday night during the debate on the budget. He focussed on the broadcaster’s admission that it had 318 people earning more than £50,000 without paying tax at source. “That is not acceptable,” he told MPs.

He described Lester as “the head of the Student Loans Company who was not having tax deducted at source even though he was, to all intents and purposes, a full-time employee. The government has correctly agreed to fix that, and to undertake a review of the rest of the public sector.”

He added: “The review that is being conducted across government… explicitly excludes the BBC. I ask ministers to reconsider that.”

The BBC also said in response to the FOIA request from Mowat, who is a member of the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC), that “service-company contracts” are “usually used as an alternative to the self-employed freelance contract because the individual chooses to provide their services through a limited company. The BBC contracts with the service company, and the service company is responsible for paying tax and [national insurance] for the worker, if appropriate.”

According to the response, the BBC had 20,000 salaried staff and “typically” 12,000 freelancers in any year. It continued: “Around 3,000 of these choose to provide their services via a limited company.”

It went on to give figures for the numbers of people working for the BBC without having tax deducted at source who earn above specific pay levels. It said that only 1,363 of them earn above £26,000. This showed, it said, that the majority of people working without tax being deducted at source worked for a range of organisations.

Stephen Barclay, another Conservative MP on the PAC, told Exaro: “This reply shows that there is a need for much greater transparency at the BBC because the figures do not include so many people from BBC’s talent – which covers its main presenters – and its commercial operations.”

“There is also a duty on the BBC Trust over accountability to check whether people who are employed through these companies do not have rolling contracts running every year and are working exclusively for the BBC.”

A BBC spokesman said: “The use of service companies is standard practice in the broadcasting industry and is in keeping with HMRC guidelines.”

Related Stories

Sarah Davies
Sarah Davieshttps://www.exaronews.com/
Exaro News investigates matters of public interest and seeks to uncover the truth.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest news

Man shot in the head on his way home from work, then victimized by Monroe County Sheriffs

In this episode Shawn Ryan sits down with Don Bradley A.K.A. Head Shot Don, who is a former Green...

Huge spike in coronavirus infections and deaths

There was a huge spike in confirmed coronavirus infections today, along with a significant spike in deaths. Total Confirmed Cases:...

Naked guy ambushes NYPD cop, shooting him in the chest

A 29-year-old man waited naked in the hallway of a housing complex in Harlem to ambush a cop, standing...

Six-year-old kids armed and trained to fight Mexican drug cartels

A child militia in Mexico’s southwestern state of Guerrero is training boys, some as young as 6, to serve...

Canadians Targeted in Debit Card Fraud, Check Your Bank Statements

A number of Canadians have been affected by debit card fraud in the past 30-days despite never having used...

Marshall County Man Convicted of Federal Cyberstalking and Gun Crime

A Marshall County man was convicted Thursday afternoon of cyberstalking as well as a federal gun violation following a...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you