• News
Exaro News Archive Theresa May changed her mind about ‘Maddie’ police review

Theresa May changed her mind about ‘Maddie’ police review

-

Theresa May changed her mind about ‘Maddie’ police review

Home secretary denied backing review because of lobbying by News International

By David Hencke and Hui Shan Khoo | 27 November 2012

Theresa May changed her mind about ‘Maddie’ police reviewHome secretary Theresa May changed her mind on whether there should be a review in the UK of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance in Portugal.

But, she told Lord Justice Leveson’s inquiry into newspaper practices, her decision was not because of pressure from News International (NI).

Robert Jay, counsel to the inquiry, asked her about telephone calls on May 11, 2011 with Rebekah Brooks, then NI chief executive, and Dominic Mohan, The Sun’s editor.

That day, NI’s red-top tabloid, The Sun, was preparing its edition carrying an open letter on the front page from Madeleine’s parents requesting a review of the case.

Two NI executives had warned aides to David Cameron, prime minister, that the government must order a review, otherwise The Sun would publish the open letter.

Cameron is accused of, ultimately, bowing to pressure from NI executives to order British police to review Madeleine’s case.

Jay asked the home secretary last May whether she recalled the telephone calls with Brooks and Mohan on that day.

May said: “I do. Would you like me to tell you?”

Jay: “Yes, please.”

May: “This was in relation to the question about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and the action that the government was taking, and that the Metropolitan Police was taking, to work with the Portuguese authorities to look further into the matters relating to that disappearance, to see whether there were any other avenues of inquiry that should be pursued.”

Jay: “Because a review was ordered by the Home Office – in other words, by you – at quite short notice…”

May: “No, a review was not ordered, was not requested or required at short notice. The Home Office… first started discussing with ACPO [Association of Chief Police Officers] the possibility of a police review, or further police work, on this. They first started discussing that with ACPO under the previous government.

“So, the discussion had been taking place for some time – it took place with ACPO initially – for ACPO to identify which police force would be appropriate to undertake this work, if it were to be undertaken.”

“At the same time, there were discussions taking place with the Portuguese authorities, because, of course, no UK police force can go into another country and start investigating. They can only do so with the agreement, approval and assistance of the resident authorities in that country.”

Jay: “Did you have discussions with the prime minister about this specific issue on or about May 11?”

May: “I do not recall having a specific discussion myself with the prime minister. I know that the prime minister was interested in this specific issue, but I do not recall whether I had a specific conversation with him.”

Jay: “Did Mrs Brooks say… that unless you ordered the review, you would be on the front page of The Sun until that happened?”

May denied this. “The nature of the telephone conversation was to alert them to the fact that the government was taking some action, that there was going to be this further work by the police here in the UK.”

She added: “I think that it was a call at my instigation.”

Jay asked whether “pressure” was applied “behind the scenes”.

May replied: “I felt that the work that we were doing to look at this review had been going on for
some time, it was coming to fruition around this time anyway, and, obviously, the issue was a
matter of public concern.”

Kate McCann recalled it differently. In her book, ‘Madeleine’, she described how Alan Johnson, May’s predecessor as home secretary under the previous Labour government, had commissioned a “scoping” exercise to see whether a review would be worthwhile.

The report, completed in March 2010, was “widely described as highlighting some deficiencies” in the Portuguese investigation, she wrote.

“We met the current home secretary, Theresa May, and wrote to her several times. Still no further forward, and in the dark as to whether the British government had even broached the matter with the Portuguese authorities, in November 2010 we started a petition to lobby the two governments to conduct an independent review.”

“We were at a loss to comprehend why,” she added, “our request had gone unanswered.”

Related Stories

Sarah Davies
Sarah Davieshttps://www.exaronews.com/
Exaro News investigates matters of public interest and seeks to uncover the truth.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest news

“Free Hong Kong” Shirt Give-Away – Holding the NBA & U.S. Corps accountable

PRESS RELEASE: San Francisco, CA. (Oct 18th 2019) Corporations and organizations in the United States of America have remained...

Aaron Dean, Fort Worth Officer Charged With Murder After Shooting That Killed Atatiana Jefferson

The Fort Worth police officer who shot and killed Atatiana Jefferson early Saturday morning was arrested and charged with...

Let’s Talk DIET, with JC Money

I've heard it all - Dubrow, Keto, Intermitten, Atkins. All too often questions about diet are way too specific, given...

Mathuram Muthuraja the drunken tube pusher gets sentence increased

A man who drunkenly pushed another man onto the tube tracks has had his sentence increased after intervention by...

Exaro News is Expanding – Press Release

LONDON, Sept. 18, 2019 /Exaro News/ -- Exaro News, a website specializing in carrying out in-depth investigations is expanding...

Virtual Global Accelerator is Now Accepting Applications for $150k Seed Funding

Village Global, an early-stage venture capital firm backed by some of the world’s most successful entrepreneurs is now accepting...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you